![]() While it is true that the only difference is the presence of radar, it completely changes the play style of the ship. I'm going to have to disagree with the others. But I have Missouri, and I having that Radar Consumable on hand is wonderful, that extra bit of utility occasionally makes me forget Mo's a Battleship. Last time I had Iowa was CBT but I could be mistaking the NC for her. From a gameplay standpoint I'm unable to advise on the similarities and differences between Iowa and Missouri. Once you have a lv19 USN CMDR, what better ship to earn ECxp on than Missouri at T9? All of a sudden that "USN Trainer" is capable of assisting with training ALL your Commanders through ECxp earnings.Īnyways, food for thought. And while that doesn't sound like much consider this thought: While your need for a USN cmdr Trainer is currently needed. One final thing to consider though, is that She is a T9 Premium. I usually just grab FWB or if all my other side-grinds are "in battle" because I forced a poor engagement. Was reason enough for me although I do play BBs on the side moreso than DDs. For some that option of extra credit earnings for a "Port Queen" is reason enough to acquire her for the hefty sum of 750k FExp. It could be Mo, could be a T9 for a different nation, could be Wisconsin or New Jersey (Iowa with Radar less credit capabilities than Mo). At present there's no "tells" from WG what the next FExp ship will be after Musashi. So from a collection standpoint it might be worth it. Based on your counterpoints for not purchasing it I'd say your FExp would probably suit yourself elsewhere.īut your thoughts on Mo being gone for the "short term" might be incorrect.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |